Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why diffient stage of FrcnnOutput has different cls_prob and stage 1st has the highest cls_score #13

Closed
Peng-wei-Yu opened this issue May 30, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@Peng-wei-Yu
Copy link

I train cascade rcnn on my own dataset and when testing the val data, I find that 1st stage has the highest cls_score to a object, 2nd stage has the lowest cls_score to the same object. for example, testing pinture a.jpg, 1st stage's FrcnnOutput to a person in a.jpg get cls_score 0.9763, 2nd stage's FrcnnOutput to the person in a.jpg get cls_score 0.5624, is that normal?

@zhaoweicai
Copy link
Owner

It is possible that the scores at 2nd stage are lower than that at 1st stage, because the 2nd stage has higher IoU requirement. A single score on a single example can't tell too much. You may need to evaluate on the whole datasets to see the difference across stages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants