You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi I tried the "polladiff" model with defult settings on METR_LA dataset and I got test performance with mae around 9 by "exp.test(setting)", but I found the performance listed in the paper is around 3, which is closer to the validation loss during training. So could you please tell where the results listed in the paper come from?
below is what it looks like by running "exp.test(setting)" with batch size of 16
thanks!!
Use GPU: cuda:0
adjinit shape: torch.Size([207, 207])
Hi I tried the "polladiff" model with defult settings on METR_LA dataset and I got test performance with mae around 9 by "exp.test(setting)", but I found the performance listed in the paper is around 3, which is closer to the validation loss during training. So could you please tell where the results listed in the paper come from?
below is what it looks like by running "exp.test(setting)" with batch size of 16
thanks!!
Use GPU: cuda:0
adjinit shape: torch.Size([207, 207])
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: