Wrong Route Set

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. My configuration: 2 IMS clients on different P-CSCF and one S-CSCF.
UE A --> PCSCF18 --> SCSCF17 --> PCSCF16 --> UE B (IMSDroid or Boghe)
2. IMS client A calls IMS client B. B answers.
3. B then drops the call

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
UE B sends BYE to PCSCF16 but Route header is not constructed OK!
UE B should not invert the order of Record-Route before placing into Route 
header.
BYE request from UE B to PCSCF16 should have Route header like this:

Route: PCSCF16, SCSCF17, PCSCF18
but instead sends
Route: PCSCF18, SCSCF17, PCSCF16

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Samsung I9000, IMSDroid v1.2.366

Please provide any additional information below.
The same problem exist on Boghe_1.0.58.550. I am testing also with Mercuro Gold 
4.0.1631.0 where this problem doesnt exist.
Wireshart trace taken at PCSCF16 is attached.

Regards

Ales

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ales.st...@gmail.com on 25 Feb 2011 at 8:21

Attachments:

• imsdroid_routeset_error.zip

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 28 Feb 2011 at 9:18

• Changed state: Accepted
• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes, please invert the sequence in case of B-side initiated requests, otherwise 
e.g. a session can never be release by the B-side.

Original comment by efra...@gmail.com on 4 Jun 2011 at 3:55

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 45 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 19 Jul 2011 at 2:10

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Should be fixed in 2.0.104.715

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 21 Jun 2012 at 6:14

• Changed state: Fixed
• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****