Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the usage of q_q_dist #28

Open
justopit opened this issue Mar 17, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Question about the usage of q_q_dist #28

justopit opened this issue Mar 17, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@justopit
Copy link

Hello! your reranking is a good job! However, there is a problem about your usage of q_q_dist. Without q_q_dist, it seems that your reranking would drop a lot. I do the experiments below

mAP of No reranking mAP of reranking with q_q_dist mAP of reranking without q_q_dist
70.3 85.7 71.9
23.9 34.7 25.5
24.0 35.2 25.5

It is so weird. Could you explain it?

@miracle24
Copy link

Hello, @zhunzhong07. I encountered a similar problem. I also wonder why to use q_q_dist? I mean, in practical ReID scenarios, there may be not enough query images for q_q_dist.

@edwardnguyen1705
Copy link

@zhunzhong07
If the algo requires q_q_dist, then it is not practical?
In real-world application query is a track of images (multi-shot) and each person in the gallery also contains a large number of images. Is your algo is applicable?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants