You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a Trustee who did the proposal, I can remove it if there are no votes for it yet, so that proposals sent by mistake can be easily removed without requiring 2/3 of Trustees to vote reject.
Note:
Can be done only by the Trustee who sent the proposal
The proposal can be just removed from the state, no need to keep it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I suggest we further consider under what circumstances a removal can be initiated and what steps must be taken to effect a removal. The suggested resolution is not sufficient when one or more approvals has occurred yet removal is the appropriate action.
It may be that one or more additional states is required; perhaps disputed/challenged, abandoned. If a proposed action is disputed/challenged, it could no longer be approved, until the dispute/challenge was resolved. Once resolved a proposal might be abandoned (or returned to the proposed state). Of course we would need to define mechanisms for resolution/disposition of disputes or challenges.
We're seeing significant latency in trustee approvals. I am concerned that the proposed solution requires that errors be caught quickly and if not caught before one approval, the proposal must be approved, leaving the DCL with incorrect information until a removal request is issued and subsequently approved.
As a Trustee who did the proposal, I can remove it if there are no votes for it yet, so that proposals sent by mistake can be easily removed without requiring 2/3 of Trustees to vote reject.
Note:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: