Improve History of a Coin

[nopara73]

I think History should be renamed to Clusters and instead of labels, we should keep track of clusters as colored bubbles for example.
Somehow like this:

So you want to make sure you don't connect two wallet clusters, etc...

[lontivero]

I would like to take this one but I don't fully understand the concept of cluster. Could you explain it, @nopara73? Is it possible to implement this change with the current SmartCoin class as it is?

[lontivero]

Oh, this is no for release 1. I won't take it now.

[nopara73]

Nah, putting the wallet clusters together is really complicated. There are so many things to pay attention here this is pure blockchain analysis. At this point, I'm not even sure if it's possible.

[blatherdrift]

Maybe Boltzman tool can calculate the probabilities for your clusters?

[nopara73]

It cannot. It doesn't look at transaction chains yet. Also we cannot (at least directly) apply it to our transactions, either, because I prefer not to break the clusters until a link gets anonymity set over 50.

However I should take a deeper look at it, it's a promising start.

From another point of view, the problem with traditional bc analysis, like boltzmann in general is that it is guessing what is in the wallet. I have an easier time with my in-wallet bc analysis, because I know exactly what is in the wallet.

So I take the strongest assumption that bc analysis got everything right and only reward the coins in the wallet with anonymity sets when it is undeniable.

[MaxHillebrand]

I think it would help already to differentiate the color of the "standard" phrases like Change of & ZeroLink Mixed Coin & ZeroLink Dequeued Change & etc. from the user selected Label.

For example the color differentiation between these two, the darker for the standard phrases, and the lighter for user input.

However, the cluster is really cluttered, and it might be worth investigating of how to do it overall better...

[nopara73]

This is old.