[Release] Add missing BitBox implementation? #12521
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
BitBox02 implement
|
I made a mistake for sure moving the item to "merged" in this board. I am not sure why I believed that. Praise you guys for noticing! |
Yesm I think that too. Ty @adamPetho |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Equivalent of #12341
Files changes are a bit different, because #12390 already added the
WalletType.BitBoxto the codebase.Guys, any reason why we left out the BitBox implementation from the release??
If there is, close this PR.
If not, then I'm glad Thib reached out to me and asked questions.