Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[VDG] Display fee rate & estimated time constantly instead of tooltip #7638

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 3, 2024

Conversation

yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator

@yahiheb yahiheb commented Mar 26, 2022

Fixes #6980

Credit goes to @ichthus1604 for writing this code which was reverted by 07e1755 in #7212

Co-authored-by: ichthus1604 <ichthus1604@gmail.com>
@yahiheb yahiheb changed the title Display fee rate & estimated time constantly instead of tooltip [VDG] Display fee rate & estimated time constantly instead of tooltip Mar 26, 2022
@soosr
Copy link
Collaborator

soosr commented Mar 28, 2022

It was downvoted. That is why @ichthus1604 reverted it.

@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Mar 28, 2022

Why was it downvoted? IMO given that the fee graph window is for advanced users it makes more sense to display those value constantly rather than requiring the user to hover over the slider to see them.

Copy link
Collaborator

@MarnixCroes MarnixCroes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

WalletWasabi.Fluent/Views/Wallets/Send/SendFeeView.axaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Marnix <93143998+MarnixCroes@users.noreply.github.com>
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 31, 2022

This has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label May 31, 2022
@yahiheb yahiheb removed the stale label May 31, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 30, 2022

This has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jul 30, 2022
@yahiheb yahiheb removed the stale label Jul 30, 2022
@SuperJMN
Copy link
Collaborator

SuperJMN commented Aug 3, 2022

Hey, I found this one and it looks there were a consensus to not accept these changes.
Please, keep or close this PR since it was stale.

@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Aug 4, 2022

Hey, I found this one and it looks there were a consensus to not accept these changes.

What was the reason to not accept these changes?

As I stated above the fee graph is for advanced users anyway so it makes sense to display the fee rate values and the estimation time constantly.

@ichthus1604
Copy link
Collaborator

@yahiheb I'm closing this PR due to reasons previously stated. There is consensus to not introduce these changes.

@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Aug 31, 2022

@ichthus1604 I still don't know what are the reasons to not accept these changes, and the comment you linked simply says that Dan asked to revert those changes but without any explanation.

@ichthus1604
Copy link
Collaborator

@yahiheb the idea was not to visually highlight or put the fee rate into a position where it can grab too much user attention.

@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Aug 31, 2022

@yahiheb the idea was not to visually highlight or put the fee rate into a position where it can grab too much user attention.

Is the fee graph in the normal send work flow? I guess the answer to that is no.
If a user gets to the fee graph dialog it means that they are willing to adjust the fee rate manually so we can assume that they know what they are doing.

And as I said repeatedly before the fee graph is for advanced users and it makes sense to display the fee rate values constantly instead of having to hover over the slider to get that.

@yahiheb yahiheb reopened this Apr 14, 2023
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/S and removed size/M labels Apr 14, 2023
@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Apr 14, 2023

This PR addresses one of the issues mentioned in #10488.

Even on that next page it's not obvious at all what the fee is, We need to know to read the chart along the Y axis to see what fee is.
image

@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Apr 14, 2023

This is how the fee rate dialog looks with this PR:

Capture

@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Apr 15, 2023

This is horrible from UI perspective.

Why is that?
Currently it is horrible from UX perspective as mentioned here:

Even on that next page it's not obvious at all what the fee is, We need to know to read the chart along the Y axis to see what fee is.

I am not nACKing the concept... but please someone give a reason why is this needed.

For a better UX. To allow users to see that information easily without hovering over the slider to get that.

@soosr
Copy link
Collaborator

soosr commented Apr 17, 2023

Why is that?

They are just put there and centralized.

Normally the values should be aligned in a column like:

                   Fee Rate: 7 sat/vbyte
Estimated Confirmation Time: ~50 mins

And put them somewhere inside the chart to avoid the crowded bottom part and have the chart on almost full dialog size.

@wieslawsoltes
Copy link
Collaborator

Why is that?

They are just put there and centralized.

Normally the values should be aligned in a column like:

                   Fee Rate: 7 sat/vbyte
Estimated Confirmation Time: ~50 mins

And put them somewhere inside the chart to avoid the crowded bottom part and have the chart on almost full dialog size.

Agree they should be put inside chart to save vertical space and will look much better.

@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Apr 17, 2023

@soosr @wieslawsoltes I agree, but I do not know how to do it, so please feel free to take this and do that.

@soosr
Copy link
Collaborator

soosr commented Apr 20, 2023

@wieslawsoltes Should we add it to the chart directly, or just put an overlay on the chart?
(assume to the chart would be the proper solution, if there is no obvious objection due to complexity)

@soosr soosr marked this pull request as draft April 20, 2023 10:18
@wieslawsoltes
Copy link
Collaborator

@wieslawsoltes Should we add it to the chart directly, or just put an overlay on the chart? (assume to the chart would be the proper solution, if there is no obvious objection due to complexity)

Overlay, adding to chart adds unnecessary complexity.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 23, 2023

This has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 23, 2023
@yahiheb yahiheb removed the stale label Jun 23, 2023
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 16, 2023

This has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Sep 16, 2023
@yahiheb yahiheb removed the stale label Sep 17, 2023
@turbolay
Copy link
Collaborator

turbolay commented Dec 21, 2023

Can we at least add the feerate used here? Auto selected to let user override it without requiring more clicks.

CleanShot 2023-12-21 at 16 44 36@2x

Having to move the slider to know this information is really weird and quite annoying.

@yahiheb yahiheb marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2023 23:37
@yahiheb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yahiheb commented Dec 21, 2023

The chart dialog is not displayed in the default workflow, and some argue it is for advanced users so I think this is good enough for now, and later on the UX can be improved more.

@MaxHillebrand MaxHillebrand added this to the v2.0.6 milestone Dec 27, 2023
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/L and removed size/M labels Jan 3, 2024
@soosr soosr merged commit ee86b7c into WalletWasabi:master Jan 3, 2024
3 of 6 checks passed
@MaxHillebrand
Copy link
Collaborator

2 years until merge, lol, glad it's over the finish line 🖤

@yahiheb yahiheb deleted the fee-rate-estimated-time branch January 3, 2024 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"Fee Rate & Estimated Time" should always be displayed at tx fee slider
8 participants