-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate "airport" from "sector" #745
Comments
This morning I put some more thought into this. Here's what I'm thinking:
In the following examples, we will use KSFO. The The In a given simulation, users can choose to work only a single sector within a given facility (perhaps Woodside, the 28L final sector), all the sectors of the facility combined simultaneously, or a combination of certain adjacent sectors (perhaps Woodside and Foster, the final sectors for the 28s). And things will be divided up similar to this: Facility:
Sector:
Airport:
|
This sounds awesome! So with this idea taxiways and stands are going to be implemented? |
Well that's a colossal undertaking in and of itself, where this is more of a reorganization that will be more conducive to having different controller roles and multiplayer, that sort of thing. But that is definitely the planned list of eventualities! |
Cool! When this gets done I will have to update GCRR :-) |
This is solution that I'm looking for! Warsaw Approach is responsible for arriving and departing aircraft for two airports EPWA and EPMO, so this feature will solve my problem with correct implementation of that sector. I'm looking forward to this feature! |
The ATC repository is being migrated to it's new home at https://github.com/openscope/openscope, Please note that the vast majority of these issues have been copied to the new repository, or else are covered by other issues created there. See the below screenshot for what it looks like when your issue is known in the new repo: Thank you! Closing this issue. |
Currently, everything that has to do with playing in a certain airspace is stored as properties of the "airport". But what about places where a single ATC facility is providing services to multiple airports? (aka just about everywhere)
Work should be done to move away from keeping things like navigational data (fixes/airways/procedures), video maps, etc under the airport, and make new classes called
Facility
andSector
which represents the given ATC facility and control position being simulated. For example, if I am working Miami Approach (consolidated to a single sector), I would work arrivals/departures to/from KMIA, KFLL, KOPF, KTMB, and others. MySector
within the Miami TRACONFacility
has the stuff relating to my role in the simulation, and each of the airports are anAirport
, which have their own runways and procedures defined within.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: