Let's update Copyright notice to 2019.

[fabriciofx]

Let's update Copyright notice to 2019.

[0crat]

@llorllale/z please, pay attention to this issue

[0crat]

@fabriciofx/z this project will fix the problem faster if you donate a few dollars to it; just click here and pay via Stripe, it's very fast, convenient and appreciated; thanks a lot!

[0crat]

@llorllale/z please, pay attention to this issue

[0crat]

@fabriciofx/z this project will fix the problem faster if you donate a few dollars to it; just click here and pay via Stripe, it's very fast, convenient and appreciated; thanks a lot!

[llorllale]

@fabriciofx I don't understand why we should be maintaining a range of dates for the copyright notice. As far as I am aware, the really important date is the one when the work was published (the start date). You may add a "revised date" to the notice if a file's contents changes "significantly", but do we really need to? Guava certainly doesn't do it. I'm guessing the hassle isn't worth it.

Sources:

• Copyright.gov (PDF)
• StackOverflow

[llorllale]

@yegor256 WDYT about dropping date ranges from the copyright notice and just leave the original publication date?

[fabriciofx]

@llorllale I agree with you. Let's wait for @yegor256 opinion. But let me know if you would like to close this issue and open another or just rename the title (and the others, like cactoos/#985, ok?

[0crat]

Job gh:zold-io/java-api#87 is not assigned, can't get performer