Release 0.1

[eprothro]

Hi guys, any reason to not release 0.1.0? Just curious if there was an ongoing discussion I didn't see. I've been using tag: 'v0.1.0beta3' in production for a few months...

[kch]

Yeah, it's not released because it's still kinda broken. Particularly, #30 is a concern.

[eprothro]

@kch I was under the impression that #30 was happening with 0.0.4 as well, and thus isn't a regression. It's been a while, but I'm pretty certain I experienced that with 0.0.4 and it was one of the reasons I gave the 0.1 beta a try. Thoughts?

[PikachuEXE]

If there is no regression, I prefer releasing and fixing #30 in next version.

[kch]

Fair enough. I'm going to review all open issues etc this week.

I also wanna change some of the word in the new logging system before making it final.

[kch]

We're going to do a release without #30. Reopening.

[eprothro]

👍

[kch]

At this point #37 is the only real real blocker to getting a "final" beta out. The rest is documentation and can go out in GA without a beta.

[kch]

Speaking of documentation, the README needs be much updated. The good news is that the source is now ridden with comments.

[kch]

0.1.0beta4 is out. (commit: 611816f)

It hasn't undergone a ton of testing, but it passes the tests that have been contributed so far. (see kch-testing-* branches)

[kch]

What I mean is: Please test it with your apps and report back! Many thanks.

[kch]

it's out.