Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bogus warning: inherited methods are not "nonexistent" #49

Closed
tseaver opened this issue Nov 5, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Bogus warning: inherited methods are not "nonexistent" #49

tseaver opened this issue Nov 5, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
invalid
Projects
Zope 4 final release

Comments

@tseaver
Copy link
Member

tseaver commented Nov 5, 2017

E.g.: zopefoundation/Products.PythonScripts#13

Subclasses should be free to remap the permissions of base class methods without adding a shim: in fact, OFS.History.Historical.manage_historyCopy is designed that way.
@tseaver tseaver mentioned this issue Nov 5, 2017
Closed
@icemac icemac added this to To do in Zope 4 final release Jul 12, 2018
@icemac
Copy link
Member

icemac commented Oct 3, 2018

Currently Products.CMFCore.PortalContent.PortalContent provokes warning about missing manage_FTPstat.

@icemac
Copy link
Member

icemac commented Oct 3, 2018

But the method does not exist, so it is correct that AccessControl complains.
In the Products.PythonScripts the methods were also not existing because they were removed in Zope 4.0a2. So I do not see that this problem exists for inherited methods.

@icemac icemac closed this as completed Oct 3, 2018
Zope 4 final release automation moved this from To do to Done Oct 3, 2018
@icemac icemac added the invalid label Oct 3, 2018
@icemac icemac moved this from Done to Postponed or Rejected in Zope 4 final release Oct 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
invalid
Projects
No open projects
Zope 4 final release
  
Postponed or Rejected
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tseaver @icemac