Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can zodbpickle be forced to use dill? Currently it can't serialize custom classes like dill #72

Closed
radiantone opened this issue Aug 28, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@radiantone
Copy link

Can zodbpickle be forced to use dill? Currently it can't serialize custom classes like dill

@d-maurer
Copy link

d-maurer commented Aug 28, 2022 via email

@agroszer
Copy link
Contributor

Why do you need zodbpickle? You have a DB that needs simultaneous access from py2.7 and py3.x clients?

@radiantone
Copy link
Author

radiantone commented Aug 29, 2022

Yoi are saying that z0db doesnt have to use z0dbpickle?

@icemac
Copy link
Member

icemac commented Apr 16, 2024

I am closing this old issue. Feel free to re-open it if there are any news about the topic.

@icemac icemac closed this as completed Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants