Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PortChecker test seems to break in out of tree builds #173

Open
dvzrv opened this issue Jan 23, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

PortChecker test seems to break in out of tree builds #173

dvzrv opened this issue Jan 23, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@dvzrv
Copy link
Contributor

dvzrv commented Jan 23, 2022

Hi! When working on the package for 3.0.6 and the CI integration for Arch Linux, I noticed that the PortChecker test started failing.

I believe this is due to building out of tree (i.e. build directory is not in project directory).
The test should not fail on this not uncommon scenario.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

Reproduced with current zyn's master on 1 Arch Linux machine sometimes, but it always works with onther Arch linux machine. On one of my machines, it builds fine if the build directory is 1 level under the source tree, but fails sometimes in all other cases (i.e. 2 levels beneath, or in /tmp). The only thing I observe currently is that zyn does not reply anything at all.

It's a really strange issue. If a relative path would be wrong, then it would fail on both Arch Linux machines always.

@dvzrv I just pushed a fix on current master (that uses the MIDI dummy engine) that might fix the issue. Can you please re-try?

@dvzrv
Copy link
Contributor Author

dvzrv commented May 21, 2022

I guess you are referring to 6e25116?

That did not fix the issue unfortunately.

@JohannesLorenz
Copy link
Contributor

I guess you are referring to 6e25116?

Yes, I mean that one. Hmm, I need to continue debugging it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants