Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Daemon #551

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: stage
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add Daemon #551

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

usiegl00
Copy link
Contributor

@usiegl00 usiegl00 commented Dec 2, 2021

Card

See issue #528

Details

This breaks the shell command.
The shell command works with the --no-pty flag.
There is some discussion here on how to spawn a pty in a daemon.

@moloch--
Copy link
Member

moloch-- commented Dec 2, 2021

We'll need build constraints around the platform specific implant code.

@moloch-- moloch-- self-assigned this Dec 2, 2021
@moloch-- moloch-- added the v1.5.0 label Dec 2, 2021
@@ -57,15 +57,21 @@ func RemoteTask(processID int, data []byte, rwxPages bool) error {
return nil
}

// SideloadFile - Create a file for use with Sideload
func SideloadFile(data []byte) (string, error) {
fdPath := fmt.Sprintf("/tmp/.%s", randomString(10))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use the stdlib create tmp file please.

@moloch--
Copy link
Member

moloch-- commented Dec 2, 2021

For shell, we can add a check to see if the current sessions' implant config is a daemon and automatically pass in --no-pty

@usiegl00
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pr has been here for a while now, are there any changes you need to get this across the line?

@moloch--
Copy link
Member

Oh yes, sorry I can review shortly. I think I wanted to make a couple small tweaks but I can probably take care of them.

@usiegl00
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, let me know if you want any assistance.

@rkervella
Copy link
Member

@usiegl00 when you find some time, can you try to resolve the conflicts with the stage branch? I'll merge once the conflicts are resolved.

@moloch--
Copy link
Member

moloch-- commented Nov 4, 2022

It looks like most of them are in generated code, I can maybe resolve them.

@moloch-- moloch-- added v1.6.x and removed v1.5.0 labels Jan 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants