Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updating readme to make it easier to deploy using docker #117

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

keepittechie
Copy link

@keepittechie keepittechie commented Mar 18, 2024

small edit to readme

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 18, 2024

Deploy Preview for web-check ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit be41fc7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/web-check/deploys/65f8a4e09268b90008d18099
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-117--web-check.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@@ -779,8 +779,16 @@ Click the button below, to deploy to Vercel 👇

### Deploying - Option #3: Docker

Pull Image: `docker pull lissy93/web-check`
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Image: docker pull lissy93/web-check

I don't think this is necessary, as if the image isn't found locally, it'll be pulled automatically during the run command. The exception being, unless they user wants to use a different registry (like GHCR). But in this instance, running that pull command will just download it from DockerHub, same as in the run command.

Run `docker run -p 3000:3000 lissy93/web-check`, then open [`localhost:3000`](http://localhost:3000)

or:

Run `docker -d --name webcheck -p 3000:3000 --restart=always lissy93/web-check`, then open [`localhost:3000`](http://localhost:3000)
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to this. Or maybe a docker-compose.yml would be more suitable, as that's what most people are going to use to deploy, and it gets a bit hard to read with many docker flags.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants