Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Update software in ISO to support user namespaces #18489

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mbaynton
Copy link

This is work I've done so far to further updating the ISO to new enough versions of things to use user namespaces. It builds in and outside of the build container for me, but lacks runc since they haven't released yet (though if I add a build of runc from their main into the mix, I confirmed I can then use user namespaces with success in minikube 🎉 )

Probably makes sense to let this chill while things like runc are still baking.

Targeting an eventual
fixes #18488

temporarily disable falco, doesn't install
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @mbaynton!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/minikube 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/minikube has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mbaynton. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 21, 2024
@minikube-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mbaynton
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign afbjorklund for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

source "$BR2_EXTERNAL_MINIKUBE_PATH/package/crio-bin/Config.in"
source "$BR2_EXTERNAL_MINIKUBE_PATH/package/sysdig/Config.in"
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few packages could be removed because they were added to the newer buildroot (and otherwise cause redefinition errors)

@afbjorklund
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems to be duplicating some of the efforts from:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ISO upgrades to support user namespaces
4 participants