Create storage bucket.json

[vabmalikusa]

Related Issue:

Description of changes:

Delete once you have confirmed the following:

1. Did you add a single line summary of changes to Unreleased section in the CHANGELOG.md file?
2. Have you followed the contribution guidelines?
3. Did you run a local instance of the ocsf-server and ensure it ran without any errors/warnings?
4. Is your PR title in sync with the description?

[floydtree]

Similar to your other 2 PRs,

Thank you for the interest in contributing to OCSF.

About the content itself, it would be good understand the use-case of the new object that you are proposing and where you would like to use those in the framework. First creating a github issue to go over gap and the proposed solution would help us review it better.

Also, the json file itself seems to have been incorrectly defined. Following the contribution guidelines, running a local ocsf-server should help you identify & rectify the issues in the json file.

Finally, please fill out the PR descriptions accurately and follow the guidelines mentioned within.

[pagbabian-splunk]

Also take a look at the Datastore Activity class in the Application category. There is a databucket object as part of that class. https://schema.ocsf.io/1.3.0-dev/objects/databucket?extensions=

[davemcatcisco]

It's clear from the attributes in the storage_bucket object that the type of storage bucket being referred to is an S3 bucket or similar, i.e. the cloud-specific meaning of the term. However, the term storage bucket has a more general meaning in software engineering that probably predates the cloud-specific meaning by a couple of decades. Because the OCSF schema covers a very broad range of applications and operating contexts, I feel that OCSF event classes and objects shouldn't use a general term in a way that precludes other meanings and interpretations.

My request therefore is that you change:

• storage_bucket to cloud_storage_bucket
• Storage Bucket to Cloud Storage Bucket
• etc.