Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added support for thick RBEND in TRACK #697

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Dec 18, 2018
Merged

Added support for thick RBEND in TRACK #697

merged 5 commits into from Dec 18, 2018

Conversation

alatina
Copy link
Contributor

@alatina alatina commented Nov 15, 2018

No description provided.

@alatina alatina changed the title Added support for thick RBEND Added support for thick RBEND in TRACK Nov 15, 2018
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 15, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.007%) to 54.118% when pulling 853ffb1 on al-dev into 4767d9e on master.

@alatina alatina requested a review from ldeniau November 16, 2018 08:33
Copy link
Contributor

@ldeniau ldeniau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a test in the test suites that validates the modifications? Just to be sure that nothing was forgotten. Thanks.

@alatina
Copy link
Contributor Author

alatina commented Nov 16, 2018

Hi Laurent,

OK I will add an example, hopefully next week (from Japan).

Anyway I think you can accept the pull request already: RBENDs and SBENDs are basically the same elements, with a different definition for the entrance and exit angles E1 and E2, which I have implemented the same way it is done in TWISS. It was a very simple modification.

@alatina
Copy link
Contributor Author

alatina commented Dec 17, 2018

Hi Laurent, I added a test for the THICK tracking in the RBEND. This should close this thread and let you accept this pull request..

@ldeniau ldeniau merged commit 6379d22 into master Dec 18, 2018
@alatina
Copy link
Contributor Author

alatina commented Feb 6, 2019

Right. Then I think we can close #704

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants