Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

base_tier_validation: wrong counter for pending review #728

Closed
6 tasks
OpenCode opened this issue Oct 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
6 tasks

base_tier_validation: wrong counter for pending review #728

OpenCode opened this issue Oct 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
bug stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.

Comments

@OpenCode
Copy link
Contributor

OpenCode commented Oct 10, 2023

Module

base_tier_validation

Describe the bug

In some cases, the pending review counter reports a higher value than in reality. In fact, clicking on the relevant item shows fewer records than the number indicated. This happens because records in deleted status are also counted

To Reproduce

  • Install base_tier_validation and another tier validation (for example sale).
  • Create a tier validation rule and create 2 orders in the validation domain
  • Cancel one of the sales
    The pending count will show 2 Pending Reviews
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this issue to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Apr 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant