Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
remove spurious parenthesis [gcc8 warning] (closes #841)
- Loading branch information
1 parent
78408fa
commit c91d78a
Showing
3 changed files
with
16 additions
and
4 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
c91d78a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Dirk !
I saw in you code that you remove some parenthesis of code in #841 (if I understood correctly this ticket belong release 0.12.16, right ?!), that was exactly the message found in my code and so I tried to reinstall the Rcpp library inside RStudio and after I did this the error is keeped. When I searched in my OS (Fedora 28) I noted that was about realease 0.12.16. Maybe I miss something, could you help me understand ?
My setup information are:
R version 3.4.4 (2018-03-15)
Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: Fedora 28 (Workstation Edition)
Matrix products: default
BLAS/LAPACK: /usr/lib64/R/lib/libRblas.so
locale:
[1] LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8
[4] LC_COLLATE=C LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=pt_BR.UTF-8
[7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C LC_ADDRESS=C
[10] LC_TELEPHONE=C LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] compiler_3.4.4 tools_3.4.4
Thank you !!
c91d78a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This page describes the change; it has been made here at the source code repo here after 0.12.16 was released and is hence not in 0.12.16 -- but it will be part of the next release 0.12.17.
c91d78a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for you answer. I love your code in Rcpp and RcppArmadilllo, I'm using it in my master thesis. When you plan release the 0.12.17 ?
c91d78a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It has been submitted to CRAN; it may take a few days to get released by them. I will likely put a (source release) copy in the Rcpp drat repo from which you can install, or you can just build your own .tar.gz from this github repo.
c91d78a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I very appreciate the issue of drat. I read the documentations and I'm ready to push from "drat/src/contrib". It's possible for you liberate a preview copy of 0.12.17 there ?
c91d78a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be 'pull from' the repo; those uploading 'push'. Anyway -- 0.12.17 is there now. But let's end this conversation here as it got a little marginal. Consider asking general Rcpp questions on the rcpp-devel list.
c91d78a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you a lot Dirk ! I'll tray to pull right now and all next questions or considerations I'll share with all in rccp-devel list.