New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Generic client #1641
Merged
Merged
Generic client #1641
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5580267
Adding generic client
hkaiser 30cbced
This is a first step towards fixing 688
hkaiser aeaece6
Cleaning up client object implementation
hkaiser 552830c
Add client support to apply and apply_p
hkaiser 6ef4dc2
Finishing implementation of new client_base
hkaiser 8bb7b97
Merge branch 'master' into generic_client
hkaiser a604a61
Fixing #includes/merge conflicts
hkaiser 1952d3a
Fixing left-over member access to client_base
hkaiser 966800d
Fixing missing includes
hkaiser 52f6cd0
Adding additional customization points to decouple client_base from i…
K-ballo 2d1d71f
Remove newly introduced scoped_enum headers
hkaiser b72ce4b
Merge branch 'master' into generic_client
hkaiser b430f92
Replace generic constructor
hkaiser 98899c7
Removing unneeded boost::mpl::has_xxx in client_base
hkaiser 37a1349
Added implicit futurization to async(client_base(), ...)
hkaiser File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't this be part of the
client_base::then
implementation?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's an optimization which avoids creating a
future<future<>>
for the sole purpose of unwrapping it right away. So yes, we could simply call.then()
unconditionally if we didn't care about this overhead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I meant is to have this optimization directly in client_base. I was under the impression we had the same we have for
future<T>::then
... the only optimization we in that regard is here: https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/blob/master/hpx/lcos/detail/future_data.hpp#L565I missed the part that we need to create a new future inside ::then ... sorry for the noise.