add no_data argument to augment arg check

[malcolmbarrett]

check_arguments checks that augment methods have a data argument when strict = TRUE, but as discussed in softloud/metabroom#15, rma methods don't use data. This PR adds an argument to override the data requirement for augment while keeping other strict requirements. I'm not sure if this is the best approach (vs. deleting that requirement), but let me know what you think.

Also addresses a test result in tidymodels/broom#674

[alexpghayes]

I would prefer using strict = FALSE in the tests and documenting why with a short comment there.

[malcolmbarrett]

Sounds reasonable! I'll update on tidymodels/broom#674