quickws是一个高性能的websocket库
- 3倍的简单
- 实现rfc6455
- 实现rfc7692
quickws默认返回read buffer的浅引用，如果生命周期超过OnMessage的，需要clone一份再使用
go get github.com/antlabs/quickwspackage main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"time"
"github.com/antlabs/quickws"
)
type echoHandler struct{}
func (e *echoHandler) OnOpen(c *quickws.Conn) {
fmt.Println("OnOpen:\n")
}
func (e *echoHandler) OnMessage(c *quickws.Conn, op quickws.Opcode, msg []byte) {
fmt.Printf("OnMessage: %s, %v\n", msg, op)
if err := c.WriteTimeout(op, msg, 3*time.Second); err != nil {
fmt.Println("write fail:", err)
}
}
func (e *echoHandler) OnClose(c *quickws.Conn, err error) {
fmt.Println("OnClose: %v", err)
}
// echo测试服务
func echo(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
c, err := quickws.Upgrade(w, r, quickws.WithServerReplyPing(),
// quickws.WithServerDecompression(),
// quickws.WithServerIgnorePong(),
quickws.WithServerCallback(&echoHandler{}),
quickws.WithServerReadTimeout(5*time.Second),
)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Upgrade fail:", err)
return
}
c.StartReadLoop()
}
func main() {
http.HandleFunc("/", echo)
http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil)
}package main
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/antlabs/quickws"
"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)
type handler struct{}
func (h *handler) OnOpen(c *quickws.Conn) {
fmt.Printf("服务端收到一个新的连接")
}
func (h *handler) OnMessage(c *quickws.Conn, op quickws.Opcode, msg []byte) {
// 如果msg的生命周期不是在OnMessage中结束，需要拷贝一份
// newMsg := make([]byte, len(msg))
// copy(newMsg, msg)
fmt.Printf("收到客户端消息:%s\n", msg)
c.WriteMessage(op, msg)
// os.Stdout.Write(msg)
}
func (h *handler) OnClose(c *quickws.Conn, err error) {
fmt.Printf("服务端连接关闭:%v\n", err)
}
func main() {
r := gin.Default()
r.GET("/", func(c *gin.Context) {
con, err := quickws.Upgrade(c.Writer, c.Request, quickws.WithServerCallback(&handler{}))
if err != nil {
return
}
con.StartReadLoop()
})
r.Run()
}package main
import (
"fmt"
"time"
"github.com/antlabs/quickws"
"github.com/antlabs/wsutil/opcode"
)
type handler struct{}
func (h *handler) OnOpen(c *quickws.Conn) {
fmt.Printf("客户端连接成功\n")
}
func (h *handler) OnMessage(c *quickws.Conn, op quickws.Opcode, msg []byte) {
// 如果msg的生命周期不是在OnMessage中结束，需要拷贝一份
// newMsg := make([]byte, len(msg))
// copy(newMsg, msg)
fmt.Printf("收到服务端消息:%s\n", msg)
c.WriteMessage(op, msg)
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}
func (h *handler) OnClose(c *quickws.Conn, err error) {
fmt.Printf("客户端端连接关闭:%v\n", err)
}
func main() {
c, err := quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:8080/", quickws.WithClientCallback(&handler{}))
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf("连接失败:%v\n", err)
return
}
c.WriteMessage(opcode.Text, []byte("hello"))
c.ReadLoop()
}func main() {
quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345/test", quickws.WithClientHTTPHeader(http.Header{
"h1": "v1",
"h2":"v2",
}))
}func main() {
quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345/test", quickws.WithClientDialTimeout(2 * time.Second))
}func main() {
quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345/test", quickws.WithClientReplyPing())
}import(
"github.com/antlabs/quickws"
"golang.org/x/net/proxy"
)
func main() {
quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345", quickws.WithClientDialFunc(func() (quickws.Dialer, error) {
return proxy.SOCKS5("tcp", "socks5代理服务地址", nil, nil)
}))
}import(
"github.com/antlabs/quickws"
)
func main() {
proxy := func(*http.Request) (*url.URL, error) {
return url.Parse("http://127.0.0.1:1007")
}
quickws.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:12345", quickws.WithClientProxyFunc(proxy))
}func main() {
c, err := quickws.Upgrade(w, r, quickws.WithServerReplyPing())
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Upgrade fail:", err)
return
}
}第一：quickws 是基于 std 的方案实现的 websocket 协议。
第二：原因是 zero upgrade 对 websocket 的性能提升几乎没有影响(同步方式)，所以 quickws 就没有选择花时间优化 upgrade 过程，
直接基于 net/http， websocket 的协议是整体符合大数定律，一个存活几秒的websocket协议由 upgrade(握手) frame(数据包) frame frame 。。。组成。
所以随着时间的增长, upgrade 对整体的影响接近于0，我们用数字代入下。
A: 代表 upgrade 可能会慢点，但是 frame 的过程比较快，比如基于 net/http 方案的 websocket
upgrade (100ms) frame(10ms) frame(10ms) frame(10ms) avg = 32.5ms
B: 代表主打zero upgrade的库，假如frame的过程处理慢点，
upgrade (90ms) frame(15ms) frame(15ms) frame(15ms) avg = 33.75ms
简单代入下已经证明了，决定 websocket 差距的是 frame 的处理过程，无论是tps还是内存占用 quickws 在实战中也会证明这个点。所以没有必须也不需要在 upgrade 下功夫，常规优化就够了。
在5800h的cpu上面，tps稳定在47w/s，接近48w/s。比gorilla使用ReadMessage的38.9w/s，快了近9w/s
quickws.1:
1s:357999/s 2s:418860/s 3s:440650/s 4s:453360/s 5s:461108/s 6s:465898/s 7s:469211/s 8s:470780/s 9s:472923/s 10s:473821/s 11s:474525/s 12s:475463/s 13s:476021/s 14s:476410/s 15s:477593/s 16s:477943/s 17s:478038/s
gorilla-linux-ReadMessage.4.1
1s:271126/s 2s:329367/s 3s:353468/s 4s:364842/s 5s:371908/s 6s:377633/s 7s:380870/s 8s:383271/s 9s:384646/s 10s:385986/s 11s:386448/s 12s:386554/s 13s:387573/s 14s:388263/s 15s:388701/s 16s:388867/s 17s:389383/s
gorilla-linux-UseReader.4.2:
1s:293888/s 2s:377628/s 3s:399744/s 4s:413150/s 5s:421092/s 6s:426666/s 7s:430239/s 8s:432801/s 9s:434977/s 10s:436058/s 11s:436805/s 12s:437865/s 13s:438421/s 14s:438901/s 15s:439133/s 16s:439409/s 17s:439578/s
gobwas.6:
1s:215995/s 2s:279405/s 3s:302249/s 4s:312545/s 5s:318922/s 6s:323800/s 7s:326908/s 8s:329977/s 9s:330959/s 10s:331510/s 11s:331911/s 12s:332396/s 13s:332418/s 14s:332887/s 15s:333198/s 16s:333390/s 17s:333550/s
在5800h的cpu上面, 同尺寸read buffer(4k), 对比默认用法，quickws在30s处理119GB数据，gorilla处理48GB数据。
- quickws
quickws.windows.tcp.delay.4x:
Destination: [127.0.0.1]:9000
Interface lo address [127.0.0.1]:0
Using interface lo to connect to [127.0.0.1]:9000
Ramped up to 10000 connections.
Total data sent: 119153.9 MiB (124941915494 bytes)
Total data received: 119594.6 MiB (125404036361 bytes)
Bandwidth per channel: 6.625⇅ Mbps (828.2 kBps)
Aggregate bandwidth: 33439.980↓, 33316.752↑ Mbps
Packet rate estimate: 3174704.8↓, 2930514.7↑ (9↓, 34↑ TCP MSS/op)
Test duration: 30.001 s.
- gorilla 使用ReadMessage取数据
gorilla-linux-ReadMessage.tcp.delay:
WARNING: Dumb terminal, expect unglorified output.
Destination: [127.0.0.1]:9003
Interface lo address [127.0.0.1]:0
Using interface lo to connect to [127.0.0.1]:9003
Ramped up to 10000 connections.
Total data sent: 48678.1 MiB (51042707521 bytes)
Total data received: 50406.2 MiB (52854715802 bytes)
Bandwidth per channel: 2.771⇅ Mbps (346.3 kBps)
Aggregate bandwidth: 14094.587↓, 13611.385↑ Mbps
Packet rate estimate: 1399915.6↓, 1190593.2↑ (6↓, 45↑ TCP MSS/op)
Test duration: 30 s.
quickws的特色之一是低内存占用。
1w连接的tps测试，1k payload 回写，初始内存占用约122MB， 在240s-260s之后大约86MB，