Issues - carlosbrando/remarkable

carlosbrando / remarkable

363

Description:

Simplifying tests!

Sort by: Priority | Votes | Last Updated

Loading…

3.

0 votes

(Ruby 1.9.1) uninitialized constant Remarkable::ActiveRecord (NameError)
0 comments Created about 1 month ago by jachenry

Title

Body
spec_helper.rb ... require 'spec/autorun' require 'spec/rails' require 'remarkable_rails' ... results in the following error on ruby 1.9.1 /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:443:in `load_missing_constant': uninitialized constant Remarkable::ActiveRecord (NameError) from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:80:in `const_missing_with_dependencies' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/remarkable_rails-3.1.10/lib/remarkable_rails/active_orm.rb:17:in `<top (required)>' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/remarkable_rails-3.1.10/lib/remarkable_rails.rb:25:in `<top (required)>' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require' from /Users/user/repos/project.com/spec/spec_helper.rb:7:in `<top (required)>' from /Users/user/repos/project.com/spec/models/brand_spec.rb:1:in `require' from /Users/user/repos/project.com/spec/models/brand_spec.rb:1:in `<top (required)>' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:15:in `load' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:15:in `block in load_files' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:14:in `each' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:14:in `load_files' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:132:in `run_examples' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/command_line.rb:9:in `run' from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/bin/spec:5:in `<main>'
or cancel
spec_helper.rb
... require 'spec/autorun'
require 'spec/rails'
require 'remarkable_rails'
...

results in the following error on ruby 1.9.1

/opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:443:in `load_missing_constant': uninitialized constant Remarkable::ActiveRecord (NameError)
```
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:80:in `const_missing_with_dependencies'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/remarkable_rails-3.1.10/lib/remarkable_rails/active_orm.rb:17:in `<top (required)>'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/remarkable_rails-3.1.10/lib/remarkable_rails.rb:25:in `<top (required)>'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/activesupport-2.3.4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require'
from /Users/user/repos/project.com/spec/spec_helper.rb:7:in `<top (required)>'
from /Users/user/repos/project.com/spec/models/brand_spec.rb:1:in `require'
from /Users/user/repos/project.com/spec/models/brand_spec.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:15:in `load'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:15:in `block in load_files'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:14:in `each'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:14:in `load_files'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:132:in `run_examples'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/runner/command_line.rb:9:in `run'
from /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/bin/spec:5:in `<main>'
```
Comments

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown
4.

0 votes

ValidateLengthOfMatcher works incorrectly with i18n
0 comments Created 28 days ago by wildchild

Title

Body
ValidateLengthOfMatcher should pass actual :count option in order to construct valid error message from model. Currently it always set to "12345". http://github.com/carlosbrando/remarkable/blob/master/remarkable_activerecord/lib/remarkable_activerecord/base.rb#L185
or cancel

ValidateLengthOfMatcher should pass actual :count option in order to construct valid error message from model. Currently it always set to "12345".
http://github.com/carlosbrando/remarkable/blob/master/remarkable_activerecord/lib/remarkable_activerecord/base.rb#L185

Comments

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown
5.

0 votes

Use validation_reflection to speed up tests
0 comments Created 17 days ago by sobrinho

Title

Body
Hello carlosbrando, What you think about use validation_reflection gem to make the ActiveRecord validations? This will improve speed significantly and add support for more specific options like :if and :unless (currently unsupported). Also the tests will run without querying the database. Best regards
or cancel

Hello carlosbrando,

What you think about use validation_reflection gem to make the ActiveRecord validations?

This will improve speed significantly and add support for more specific options like :if and :unless (currently unsupported). Also the tests will run without querying the database.

Best regards

Comments

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown
6.

0 votes

typo issue when test habtm association with conditions as hash
2 comments Created 14 days ago by sobrinho

Title

Body
See the code to understand: <pre>should_have_and_belong_to_many :watches, :class_name => 'List', :conditions => { :pvt => false }</pre> The output: <pre>should have and belong to many watches with class name "List" and with conditions "pvtfalse"</pre> I think this can be: <pre>should have and belong to many watches with class name "List" and with conditions "pvt" equal "false"</pre> This is just a small typo detail, if you can fix it i will appreciate :) Best regards
or cancel
See the code to understand:
```
should_have_and_belong_to_many :watches, :class_name => 'List', :conditions => { :pvt => false }
```
The output:
```
should have and belong to many watches with class name "List" and with conditions "pvtfalse"
```
I think this can be:
```
should have and belong to many watches with class name "List" and with conditions "pvt" equal "false"
```
This is just a small typo detail, if you can fix it i will appreciate :)

Best regards
Comments
carlosbrando Wed Nov 11 18:19:56 -0800 2009 | link
sobrinho,
I tried to reproduce the same problem and I got the following result:

- should have and belong to many watches with class name "List" and with conditions {:pvt=>false}

Can you give us more information to help reproduce this problem the way you say? Which version of Remarkable are you using?
Comment
sobrinho, I tried to reproduce the same problem and I got the following result: <pre> - should have and belong to many watches with class name "List" and with conditions {:pvt=>false} </pre> Can you give us more information to help reproduce this problem the way you say? Which version of Remarkable are you using?
or cancel
sobrinho Thu Nov 12 07:14:33 -0800 2009 | link
Ruby: ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [x86_64-linux]
Rails: 2.3.3
Remarkable: 3.1.11
Rspec: 1.29

I changed test to fail and have the same behavior:

'User associations should have and belong to many watches with class name "List" and with conditions "pvttrue"' FAILED Expected User records have and belong to many watches with options {:class_name=>"List", :conditions=>"pvttrue"}, got {:class_name=>"List", :conditions=>"pvtfalse"}
Comment
Ruby: ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [x86_64-linux] Rails: 2.3.3 Remarkable: 3.1.11 Rspec: 1.29 I changed test to fail and have the same behavior: <pre>'User associations should have and belong to many watches with class name "List" and with conditions "pvttrue"' FAILED Expected User records have and belong to many watches with options {:class_name=>"List", :conditions=>"pvttrue"}, got {:class_name=>"List", :conditions=>"pvtfalse"}</pre>
or cancel
Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown
7.

0 votes

more datamapper matchers coming?
0 comments Created 2 days ago by greenm3at

Title

Body
I believe so far, only validate_is_unique is implemented. Is there plan to implement the rest of the matchers?
or cancel

I believe so far, only validate_is_unique is implemented.

Is there plan to implement the rest of the matchers?

Comments

Parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown

Labels

(Ruby 1.9.1) uninitialized constant Remarkable::ActiveRecord (NameError)

Comments

ValidateLengthOfMatcher works incorrectly with i18n

Comments

Use validation_reflection to speed up tests

Comments

typo issue when test habtm association with conditions as hash

Comments

more datamapper matchers coming?

Comments