Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

os/bluestore: remove cmake warning from extent alloc functions #10492

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 2, 2016

Conversation

chhabaramesh
Copy link
Contributor

Removing cmake related warning from alloc extents functions
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Chander Ramesh.Chander@sandisk.com

@xiexingguo
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@chhabaramesh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xiexingguo thanks for quick review :)
@ifed01 please merge if looks ok to you.

@@ -322,6 +322,8 @@ class BitMapZone: public BitMapArea{
static int64_t total_blocks;
static void incr_count() { count++;}
static int64_t get_total_blocks() {return total_blocks;}

using BitMapArea::is_allocated;
Copy link
Contributor

@ifed01 ifed01 Jul 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO one can simply remove
virtual bool BitMapArea::is_allocated(ExtentList *blocks, int64_t num_blocks, int blk_off)
to fix the warning. Looks like it's not used..

@@ -364,6 +366,7 @@ class BitMapZone: public BitMapArea{
}

int64_t alloc_blocks(int64_t num_blocks, int64_t *start_block);
using BitMapArea::alloc_blocks_dis;
Copy link
Contributor

@ifed01 ifed01 Jul 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have two remarks regarding alloc_blocks_dis method(s):
The first one - I suggest to avoid overloading virtuals at all. Hence one can rename alloc_blocks_dis( bool wait...) to something like alloc_blocks_dis_wait..
The second - Probably I missed something but I'm unable to find any use of this bool wait parameter in alloc_blocks[_dis[_int]] methods. I can see they are passed between these methods but don't see real wait var handling. Could you please point out that to me. And if my finding is correct probably one can simplify these methods and get rid of some of them...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wait flag is not used currently as it is for a mode where we want to search for blocks without jumping a zone if another thread is already allocating in that zone. So there are three modes a. ) where we keep searching and jump zones that are busy, b.) wait for the busy zone on the way to search, but still multiple threads can be active. c.) everything goes serial. I am sure this will be useful when we implement hint or at least we should not remove it till we are more clear on its usage.

@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor

cbodley commented Jul 29, 2016

@chhabaramesh thanks for looking at this. i recently created a tracker issue for it at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16766. if this makes those warnings go away, can you please add this to your commit message?
Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16766

@chhabaramesh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cbodley sure, I will add tracker number in commit message.

@chhabaramesh chhabaramesh force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 5ea4f1a to edcf257 Compare July 29, 2016 13:47
@chhabaramesh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ifed01 please merge this.

@chhabaramesh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ifed01 anything pending on my side to merge this?

@ifed01
Copy link
Contributor

ifed01 commented Aug 2, 2016

@chhabaramesh please remove additional 'using BitMapArea::is_allocated;'

tracker link: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16766
Signed-off-by: Ramesh Chander <Ramesh.Chander@sandisk.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants