Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jewel: rgw multisite: obsolete 'radosgw-admin period prepare' command #11574

Merged
1 commit merged into from Nov 11, 2016

Conversation

gaurav36
Copy link
Contributor

@gaurav36 gaurav36 commented Oct 20, 2016

All that the 'radosgw-admin period prepare' command does is create an
empty period and write it to rados. When we added the staging period
(see 'period get --staging'), uncommitted changes were written to that
instead - so the 'period prepare' command became obsolete. It should be
removed!

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17387

Reported-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kumar Garg <garg.gaurav52@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1508c70)
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 20, 2016

jenkins test this please (rbd failure)

@ghost ghost added bug-fix rgw labels Oct 20, 2016
@ghost ghost added this to the jewel milestone Oct 20, 2016
@ghost ghost self-assigned this Oct 20, 2016
@gaurav36
Copy link
Contributor Author

gaurav36 commented Oct 21, 2016

@dachary it seems from jenkins "All checks have passed"

@ghost ghost changed the base branch from jewel to jewel-next November 9, 2016 09:58
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

jenkins test this please

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

jenkins test this please (jenkins general failure)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

jenkins test this please (general jenkins failure)

@ghost ghost changed the title rgw multisite: obsolete 'radosgw-admin period prepare' command jewel: rgw multisite: obsolete 'radosgw-admin period prepare' command Nov 9, 2016
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2016
…min period prepare' command

Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@ghost ghost assigned cbodley Nov 11, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 11, 2016

@cbodley does this backport look good to merge ? It passed the rgw suite http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-3 . Note that it will not be in 10.2.4, reason why it targets jewel-next.

@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor

cbodley commented Nov 11, 2016

👍

@ghost ghost merged commit eb441bb into ceph:jewel-next Nov 11, 2016
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants