Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jewel: collection_list shadow return value # #11737

Merged
1 commit merged into from Nov 14, 2016

Conversation

Abhishekvrshny
Copy link

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17713
Signed-off-by: Haomai Wang <haomai@xsky.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8a53a60)
@Abhishekvrshny Abhishekvrshny added this to the jewel milestone Nov 2, 2016
@Abhishekvrshny Abhishekvrshny self-assigned this Nov 2, 2016
@ghost ghost changed the base branch from jewel to jewel-next November 9, 2016 09:56
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2016
Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@ghost ghost assigned tchaikov Nov 14, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 14, 2016

@tchaikov does this backport look good to merge ? It passed the rados (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-4) suite. It also passed the upgrade/jewel-x and upgrade/hammer-x (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-7) suites, except for one job which should be fixed by ceph/ceph-qa-suite#1256 and does not seem related to this pull request. Note that it won't be included in 10.2.4, reason why it targets jewel-next.

@tchaikov
Copy link
Contributor

@dachary lgtm.

@ghost ghost merged commit aa36ce8 into ceph:jewel-next Nov 14, 2016
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants