rgw: add recovery procedure for upgrade to older version of jewel #11827
Conversation
oritwas
force-pushed
the
wip-rgw-upgrade-doc
branch
from
d412c18
to
c4e82bb
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | |||
| ============= | |||
| RGW upgrade procedure to older version of jewel | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ah.. now I understand.. maybe: upgrading to Jewel versions 10.2.0, 10.2.1, 10.2.2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So is this the doc. for upgrading to jewel versions upto 10.2.4? Is this applicable for 10.2.4 as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The issue was fixed in 10.2.4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so for upgrading to 10.2.4 you don't need the workaround
|
|
||
| Upgrade of :term:`Ceph Object Gateway` to older versions of jewel (up to 10.2.3) caused issues. This document describes the needed recovery procedure. | ||
|
|
||
| Mixed version of :term:`Ceph Object Gateway` is supported only from 10.2.4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We shouldn't really say we support it, could be misunderstood.
|
|
||
| Run the following commands::: | ||
|
|
||
| $ radosgw-admin zonnegroup get --rgw-zonegroup=default | sed 's/"id":.*/"id": "default",/g' | sed 's/"master_zone.*/"master_zone":"default",/g' > default-zg.json |
| @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | |||
| ============= | |||
| RGW upgrade procedure to older version of jewel | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So is this the doc. for upgrading to jewel versions upto 10.2.4? Is this applicable for 10.2.4 as well?
|
|
||
| $ radosgw-admin zonegroup default --rgw-zonegroup=default | ||
|
|
||
| $ radosgw-adminzone default --rgw-zone=default |
oritwas
force-pushed
the
wip-rgw-upgrade-doc
branch
from
c4e82bb
to
90bcc35
Compare
|
|
||
| $ radosgw-admin zonegroup default --rgw-zonegroup=default | ||
|
|
||
| $ radosgw-admin zone default --rgw-zone=default |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit the zonegroup set and zone set commands will accept the --default flag, so you could avoid these last two steps
and am i correct that a radosgw-admin period update --commit isn't needed here because radosgw will fall back to the local zone/zonegroup objects?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
correct.
A side note the period update --commit actually fails here http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17364.
I looking at it at the moment
oritwas
force-pushed
the
wip-rgw-upgrade-doc
branch
from
90bcc35
to
59ec984
Compare
Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17820 Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
oritwas
force-pushed
the
wip-rgw-upgrade-doc
branch
from
59ec984
to
6d8f7bf
Compare
|
jenkins test this please |
Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17820
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman owasserm@redhat.com