Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jewel: osd: update_log_missing does not order correctly with osd_ops #11997

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 5, 2016

Conversation

Abhishekvrshny
Copy link

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17789
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sjust@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3ba2e2e)
@Abhishekvrshny Abhishekvrshny added this to the jewel milestone Nov 15, 2016
@Abhishekvrshny Abhishekvrshny self-assigned this Nov 15, 2016
@Abhishekvrshny Abhishekvrshny changed the base branch from jewel to jewel-next November 15, 2016 16:37
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 16, 2016

jenkins test this please (unittest_throttle stuck)

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2016
…der correctly with osd_ops

Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 5, 2016

@liewegas does this backport look good to merge ? It passed the rados (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-12) suite. It also passed the upgrade/jewel-x and upgrade/hammer-x (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-15) suites. Note that it won't be included in 10.2.4, reason why it targets jewel-next.

@ghost ghost assigned liewegas Dec 5, 2016
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2016
…der correctly with osd_ops

Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@liewegas liewegas merged commit 2ff4cc9 into ceph:jewel-next Dec 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants