Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jewel: rgw: radosgw-admin period update reverts deleted zonegroup #13171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 1, 2017

Conversation

smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17239
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit d8f42fe)
@smithfarm smithfarm self-assigned this Jan 29, 2017
@smithfarm smithfarm added this to the jewel milestone Jan 29, 2017
@smithfarm smithfarm changed the title jewel: radosgw-admin period update reverts deleted zonegroup jewel: rgw: radosgw-admin period update reverts deleted zonegroup Jan 29, 2017
@smithfarm smithfarm merged commit 73ccbdc into ceph:jewel Feb 1, 2017
@smithfarm smithfarm deleted the wip-18712-jewel branch February 1, 2017 22:53
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

(11:46:45 AM) smithfarm: owasserm: thanks. For jewel integration rgw, then, what it comes down to is verifying that these 6 valgrind failures are all libtcmalloc-related: http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/smithfarm-2017-01-31_12:35:14-rgw-wip-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/
(11:46:58 AM) smithfarm: owasserm: I will do that now
(11:47:05 AM) owasserm: smithfarm, thanks
(11:47:33 AM) smithfarm: owasserm: and assuming they are tcmalloc related, you said I can directly merge all the rgw PRs? Or do you want me to ask you for review in the PRs first?
(11:47:53 AM) owasserm: smithfarm, yes you can merge them
(11:48:19 AM) smithfarm: ok, will merge and do at least one or two more rgw runs before passing 10.2.6 to QE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants