Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: remove btrfs contradiction #9758

Merged
1 commit merged into from Sep 4, 2016
Merged

doc: remove btrfs contradiction #9758

1 commit merged into from Sep 4, 2016

Conversation

smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

@smithfarm smithfarm commented Jun 16, 2016

btrfs is not "the ideal choice for Ceph clusters" because it isn't mature and
the promised features (like deduplication) have not materialized.

The "Filesystems -> Recommended" section of this very same document (several
paragraphs) above the paragraph being modified by this commit, has been
modified to say "We used to recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any
non-critical deployments. . . . However . . . ."

This PR removes this contradiction.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler ncutler@suse.com

btrfs is not "the ideal choice for Ceph clusters" because it isn't mature and
the promised features (like deduplication) have not materialized.

The "Filesystems -> Recommended" section of this very same document (several
paragraphs) above the paragraph being modified by this commit, has been
modified to say "We used to recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any
non-critical deployments. . . . However . . . ."

This PR removes this contradiction.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
@smithfarm smithfarm changed the title doc: drop btrfs value judgment doc: remove btrfs contradiction Aug 15, 2016
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dachary Can you review?

@ghost ghost self-assigned this Sep 4, 2016
@ghost ghost merged commit 8de8d72 into ceph:master Sep 4, 2016
@jan--f jan--f deleted the wip-btrfs-not-ideal branch February 8, 2017 20:27
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant