Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pull in libcephfs2 instead of libcephfs1 #972

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jtlayton
Copy link
Contributor

Companion pull request for the ceph one here:

ceph/ceph#11647

...and the ceph-qa-suite one here:

ceph/ceph-qa-suite#1223

Mostly just ripple effects of the package rename.

...and remove both when nuking.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ ceph:
- ceph-test
- radosgw
- python-ceph
- libcephfs1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this package list only applies when running with an older ceph-qa-suite branch (e.g. hammer) that doesn't have its own packages.yaml, so the right thing is probably to leave the older package name here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jtlayton jtlayton Oct 27, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I'll reinstate it there. To be clear though, does that mean that this PR is not necessary?

ISTR that I had some trouble running tests without this change, but I could be mixed up here and the ceph-qa-suite changes were sufficient. I'll do a test run either way and see.

@jtlayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, looks like this PR isn't necessary. I think we can drop it for now.

@jtlayton jtlayton closed this Oct 28, 2016
@jtlayton jtlayton deleted the wip-jlayton-libcephfs2 branch October 28, 2016 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants