New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update clhep to 2.4.0.0 with cms patches #3672
update clhep to 2.4.0.0 with cms patches #3672
Conversation
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_10_0_X/gcc630. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: b83208e You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: AddOn
I found errors in the following addon tests: cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/nweek-02507/slc6_amd64_gcc630/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_10_0_X_2018-01-17-1100/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_Fake2.py realData=True globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Thu Jan 18 11:19:03 2018-date Thu Jan 18 11:15:27 2018 s - exit: 35584 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
@fabiocos , the addon test failures are not due to clhep. Do comparison results looks good to you? If yes then we can include new clhep for normal 10.0.X too. |
The few (minor) differences are all for RPCDigisV. This is unlikely to depend on CLHEP itself. I think we can go back to the new CLHEP in the regular build. |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_10_0_X/gcc630 IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Reverts #3670