Backport: FastSimulation-TrackingRecHitProducer: New pixel resolution files [94X]

[kpedro88]

backport of #4196

Part of the ongoing FastSim backport campaign for 94X.

attn: @ssekmen, @pmaksim1

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for branch IB/CMSSW_9_4_X/gcc630.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

• Backported from FastSimulation-TrackingRecHitProducer: New pixel resolution files #4196

[pmaksim1]

Awesome, thanks!

…

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 10:39 AM Kevin Pedro ***@***.***> wrote: backport of #4196 <#4196> Part of the ongoing FastSim backport campaign for 94X. attn: @ssekmen <https://github.com/ssekmen>, @pmaksim1 <https://github.com/pmaksim1> ------------------------------ You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: #4324 Commit Summary - FastSimulation-TrackingRecHitProducer: New pixel resolution files File Changes - *M* data-FastSimulation-TrackingRecHitProducer.spec <https://github.com/cms-sw/cmsdist/pull/4324/files#diff-0> (2) Patch Links: - https://github.com/cms-sw/cmsdist/pull/4324.patch - https://github.com/cms-sw/cmsdist/pull/4324.diff — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4324>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEppUe29e3hf4PZy6o2Bifm0AANcludSks5uZnVOgaJpZM4WhgLb> .

[smuzaffar]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30321/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: ce87cc5
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4324/30321/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4324/30321/summary.html

The workflows 1001.0, 1000.0, 140.53, 136.8311, 136.7611, 136.731, 4.22 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2721493
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 104
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2721227
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 162
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0

[fabiocos]

+1

[ssekmen]

Do we need further checks to merge this PR?

[kpedro88]

@smuzaffar @mrodozov please sign

[smuzaffar]

+externals

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_9_4_X/gcc630 IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.