New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[11.0.X] Use OpenBlas instead of GSL Blas implementation #5549
[11.0.X] Use OpenBlas instead of GSL Blas implementation #5549
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for branch IB/CMSSW_11_0_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov, @tulamor can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
|
please test |
1 similar comment
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_0_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #5540
Resolves #5528
Drop unused specs
and to make sure that we do not use lapack blas implementation we propose to drop it in favor of openblas.
Move gslcblas library in to separate directory so that no one can link against it.