Update UTM to 0.7.5

[mrodozov]

please test
Resolves: #5555
hopefully builds out of the box
@rekovic

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4697/console Started: 2020/02/17 11:33

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mrodozov (Mircho Rodozov) for branch IB/CMSSW_11_1_X/master.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov, @tulamor can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6d7936d
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-caf794/4697/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-02-16-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-caf794/4697/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2694005
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2693658
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 346
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[smuzaffar]

+externals
@silviodonato feel free to merge it

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_1_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[smuzaffar]

@silviodonato , this is needed by MWGR ( #5555 ) . It looks good. Can we get this in for next IB? so that we can backport it to 11.0.X

[silviodonato]

+1

[boudoul]

Dear @silviodonato and @smuzaffar , let's not rush on this for this MWGR (which is starting soon very soon) and discuss at the ORP , assuming @rekovic can make the presentation in the run meeting as I requested in the discussion here #5555

[rekovic]

Thanks for merging it.

Yes, as agreed in the meeting of @boudoul, we will not use it for MWGR#1. It is not critical. MWGR is used only as a full-system-in-operations test.

So, I would still like to backport it to whatever release we are going to use for the next MWGR#2, for which there should be plenty of time to prepare. i.e. switch CMSSW in operations (O2O, HLT, OnlineDQM, OfflineDQM).

[boudoul]

Dear @rekovic , @smuzaffar , could you please remind me the status of the backport ? Next MWGR is in ~3 weeks, and it would be good to have it for this MWGR . Thank you.

[smuzaffar]

@boudoul , this has been back ported and integrated in 11.0.x via #5557

[boudoul]

ah excellent, thanks @smuzaffar , I missed it .