[G4][geant4_vecgeom] Update geant4 to 10.7.2

[mrodozov]

This branch is identical to master for geant4 and vecgeom.
We can start building that IB again for G4 people to do their tests/validation
Currently there is no fresh IB for this branch

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mrodozov (Mircho Rodozov) for branch IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/geant4_vecgeom.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

[mrodozov]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-51c422/16094/summary.html
COMMIT: 4be1f7d
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_G4VECGEOM_X_2021-06-17-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/7041/16094/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 51699 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2871916
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 295995
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 249
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2575650
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.052 KiB( 37 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): 0.234 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 250202.181 ): -0.182 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
• Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 12 / 37 workflows

[mrodozov]

@civanch we can get this in for the geant4_vecgeom since it's a devel IB anyway

[mrodozov]

+externals

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/geant4_vecgeom IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[civanch]

This PR may be merged to this branch. For the master we will need extra validations.