New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CodeFormat] CMS clang-format customization not applied #26686
Comments
assign dqm, l1, alca, simulation |
New categories assigned: dqm,alca,simulation,l1 @mdhildreth,@jfernan2,@christopheralanwest,@franzoni,@andrius-k,@schneiml,@fioriNTU,@tlampen,@pohsun,@rekovic,@tocheng,@kmaeshima,@civanch you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
A new Issue was created by @smuzaffar Malik Shahzad Muzaffar. @davidlange6, @Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@smuzaffar is this just affecting the indentation in namespaces? |
@fabiocos , yes mostly but it also fixes few things e.g.
Please see #26690 which properly applied CMS clang-format customizations. |
closing this as all PRs to fix this formating are now merged in cmssw. |
Thanks to @wddgit ( #26678 (review) ) , I noticed that CMS clang-format customization (via https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/.clang-format ) were not applied in the automatic PRs [a] made by @cmsbuild. This effect packages in dqm, l1, alca, simulation categories.
Note that PRs which are already merged did not break functionality, it was just that CMS clang-format customization were not applied.
code-format build rule has been fixed and will be part of next 10.6.X IB. We will run clang-format for these merged PRs to get this code correctly fixed.
I am really sorry for the time you have wasted reviewing these PRs.
[a]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: