Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing wafers in HGCal trigger map #31506

Closed
kpedro88 opened this issue Sep 18, 2020 · 8 comments
Closed

Missing wafers in HGCal trigger map #31506

kpedro88 opened this issue Sep 18, 2020 · 8 comments

Comments

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

#31428 fixed a bug in the definition of valid cells for HGCal.

Since that PR was merged, step2 logs for WF 23234.0 (D49 detector) have a number of messages like this:

%MSG-w HGCalTriggerGeometry:  HGCalVFEProducer:hgcalVFEProducer  15-Sep-2020 07:41:38 CEST Run: 1 Event: 1
Found missing wafer (layer=31 u=0 v=1) in trigger modules mapping
%MSG

@jbsauvan can you make the necessary updates?

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign l1,upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: upgrade,l1

@benkrikler,@rekovic,@kpedro88 you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Issue was created by @kpedro88 Kevin Pedro.

@Dr15Jones, @dpiparo, @silviodonato, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jbsauvan
Copy link
Contributor

I will have a look

@jbsauvan
Copy link
Contributor

Should be fixed in #31524, with cms-data/L1Trigger-L1THGCal#20

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

kpedro88 commented Oct 1, 2020

+upgrade

@cecilecaillol
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is fully signed and ready to be closed.

@qliphy qliphy closed this as completed Apr 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants