Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

follow up to PR review of CPEFast to better reproduce Generic #34286 #34400

Open
4 of 7 tasks
slava77 opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 7 comments
Open
4 of 7 tasks

follow up to PR review of CPEFast to better reproduce Generic #34286 #34400

slava77 opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 8, 2021

@VinInn @czangela @fwyzard

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 8, 2021

A new Issue was created by @slava77 Slava Krutelyov.

@Dr15Jones, @dpiparo, @silviodonato, @smuzaffar, @makortel, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

makortel commented Jul 8, 2021

assign reconstruction, heterogeneous

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 8, 2021

New categories assigned: heterogeneous,reconstruction

@slava77,@fwyzard,@perrotta,@makortel,@jpata you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Jul 9, 2021

addressed in #34419

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Jul 9, 2021

the "plot"
image

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Jul 9, 2021

the "plot"

I guess that the point of the comment in #34286 was to have a link in the code
@mmusich may clarify the specifics.
If this was presented somewhere, perhaps a link to indico event/contribution is the most comprehensive.

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 28, 2021
Follow up to PR review of CPEFast to better reproduce Generic and #34400
@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented May 17, 2022

+reconstruction

Looks like almost everything was addressed in #34882, except reading from DB (it was replaced with a named constant instead) #34286 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants