adding HLT object monitoring to HLT online DQM

[muell149]

updating HLT object monitoring for cleaner booking and fixing a few histogram axis ranges.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @muell149 (Charlie Mueller) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

adding HLT object monitoring to HLT online DQM

It involves the following packages:

DQM/HLTEvF
DQM/Integration

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @batinkov this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

ciao @muell149
should I assume that an additional commit will come for this PR? or this is final?
let me know.
thanks,
F.

[muell149]

ciao @deguio there aren't any expected additional commits coming anytime this week/next week. This is final.

cheers
charlie

[deguio]

+1
ok. the code runs at the online only and it has been tested since a while.
I thought we agreed on some optimization (loops mainly). I guess you can do that with a separate PR.

ciao and thanks,
F.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[muell149]

@deguio The optimization is present in this PR. booking of hists is automated with loops and the number of data structure overall is reduced. There is also more parameters specified now in the python cfg. This shortened things by ~250 lines of code and the running time is roughly identical to before.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: ba30781
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10278/6625/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10278/6625/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1