Fixes for FronTier binding; More static analyzer fixes

[ggovi]

The FronTier connection string is now expanded according to the site configuration.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ggovi for CMSSW_7_0_X.

Fixes for FronTier binding; More static analyzer fixes

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/CondDB
CondCore/Utilities

@ggovi, @smuzaffar, @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@ktf you are the release manager for this.

[apfeiffer1]

+1
if Jenkins agrees :)

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:12 AM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:

A new Pull Request was created by @ggovi https://github.com/ggovi for
CMSSW_7_0_X.

Fixes for FronTier binding; More static analyzer fixes

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/CondDB
CondCore/Utilities

@ggovi https://github.com/ggovi, @smuzaffarhttps://github.com/smuzaffar,
@apfeiffer1 https://github.com/apfeiffer1, @nclopezohttps://github.com/nclopezocan you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig https://github.com/ghellwig this is something you requested
to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line
of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line
of your reply.
@ktf https://github.com/ktf you are the release manager for this.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/1033#issuecomment-25956669
.

Thanks,
cheers, andreas

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @ktf can you please take care of it?

[nclopezo]

+1
Jenkins agrees:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/853/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @ktf can you please take care of it?