Trigger name change in hotline DQM

[duanders]

Change PFMET trigger names in hotline DQM to reflect removal of HBHE noise filter.

(see https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/hlt/3977.html)

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @duanders (Dustin Anderson) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Trigger name change in hotline DQM

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/Trigger

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rociovilar, @trocino, @jhgoh, @battibass this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[perrotta]

@duanders : please notice that according to the hn message you are citing above, there are also the following two paths that need to be updated:

• (Hotline) HLT_MET250_v1 -> add hltMET250
• (Hotline) HLT_MET300_v1 -> add hltMET300

Perhaps the message for them was a bit cryptic (sorry...), but it means that for them the hltMETClean250/hltMETClean300 filters do not exist any more, as they were the filters of the now removed noise cleaned met, and they are replaced by hltMET250/hltMET300 respectively.

See lines 78 and 94 in your https://github.com/duanders/cmssw/blob/changehotlinepfmetname/DQMOffline/Trigger/python/hotlineDQM_cfi.py

Moreover: this PR should be subitted also for the data taking releases, i.e. 75X for sure, and perhaps also 74X.

Andrea

[duanders]

@perrotta -- thanks for the clarification. I changed the config to reflect the MET filter name changes.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #10359 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: c3df6de
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10359/8928/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10359/8928/summary.html