Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set MaxADC0 threshold to 9999 #10371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 30, 2015

Conversation

dertexaner
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @dertexaner for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Set MaxADC0 threshold to 9999

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/RecoAlgos

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @jdolen, @makortel, @abbiendi, @jhgoh, @ahinzmann this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@abdoulline
Copy link

Slava, David,
we need this fix asap in the data taking (74X) to avoid excessive events rejection caused by just a handful of (malfunctioning) channels...

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 25, 2015

@cmsbuild please test
On Jul 25, 2015 10:39 AM, "abdoulline" notifications@github.com wrote:

Slava, David,
we need this fix asap in the data taking (74X) to avoid excessive events
rejection caused by just a handful of (malfunctioning) channels...


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10371 (comment).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jul 29, 2015

+1

for #10371 dc61c57

  • config level change effectively disables a flag in the noise summary flag
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no differences (MC and run1 data don't have this flag contributing frequently)
  • local tests in CMSSW_7_4_X_2015-07-24-2300 /test area test10371/ using run 2 run 251721 doublemu data in /store/data/Run2015B/DoubleMuon/RAW/v1/000/251/721/00000/44C77595-412A-E511-930E-02163E012A2C.root show expected changes:
    • monitored reco products are not changing except for the noise flag itself (fwlite based plots)
    • DQM plots show differences only in jet/met plots that require some noise cleaning. There is a very large number of events that pass and enter the plots now
      251721_pfmet_dijet_sumet

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants