First integration of Pixel Alignment of large structures in PCL (74X)

[cerminar]

This PR integrates the alignment of the pixel large structures as a new PCL workflow for Tier0.
There is no code change to any production workflow, only the alca configurations are affected by the changes.

The new workflow has been integrated in the relval 1001 (which now has one more step).

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @cerminar for CMSSW_7_4_X.

First integration of Pixel Alignment of large structures in PCL (74X)

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/CommonAlignment
Alignment/CommonAlignmentAlgorithm
Alignment/CommonAlignmentMonitor
Alignment/CommonAlignmentProducer
Alignment/MillePedeAlignmentAlgorithm
CondFormats/Common
Configuration/EventContent
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences

@diguida, @boudoul, @franzoni, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @ggovi, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @pakhotin, @apfeiffer1, @makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @frmeier, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @tlampen, @mschrode, @cerati, @mmusich, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[mmusich]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: 1c10e40
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
4.22 step2

runTheMatrix-results/4.22_RunCosmics2011A+RunCosmics2011A+RECOCOSD+ALCACOSD+SKIMCOSD+HARVESTDC/step2_RunCosmics2011A+RunCosmics2011A+RECOCOSD+ALCACOSD+SKIMCOSD+HARVESTDC.log

8.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/8.0_BeamHalo+BeamHalo+DIGICOS+RECOCOS+ALCABH+HARVESTCOS/step3_BeamHalo+BeamHalo+DIGICOS+RECOCOS+ALCABH+HARVESTCOS.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10452/6813/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #10452 was updated. @diguida, @danduggan, @boudoul, @franzoni, @cerminar, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @ggovi, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 23f0057
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10452/8386/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10452/8386/summary.html

The workflows 1001.0 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

[mmusich]

+1
contains also backport of #11255

[mmusich]

Hello,@danduggan, @boudoul, @franzoni, @fabozzi, @srimanob, @ggovi,
can we have this signed again?
Thanks!
M.

[fabozzi]

+1

[ggovi]

+1

[diguida]

@davidlange6 can this be integrated now, as discussed at the ORP?