Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed behavior in QjetsAdder #10590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 6, 2015
Merged

Conversation

sidnarayanan
Copy link
Contributor

QjetsAdder would crash if more than one jet was reclustered out of the original jet. Now it returns a volatility of -1.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @sidnarayanan (Sid Narayanan) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Fixed behavior in QjetsAdder

It involves the following packages:

RecoJets/JetProducers

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @jdolen, @ahinzmann, @TaiSakuma, @yslai, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @mariadalfonso this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 5, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@sidnarayanan if you have a specific workflow configuration where the crash happens, please provide so that we have a record

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@sidnarayanan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@slava77 This snippet of code will crash on a fraction of events, where PFJetsCHS15 are CA R=1.5 jets.

process.Qjets15 = QJetsAdder.clone(
    src = cms.InputTag("PFJetsCHS15"),
    jetRad = cms.double(1.5),
    jetAlgo = cms.string(algoLabel),
    cutoff = cms.double(.1),
    ntrial = cms.int32(25)
)

Please let me know if you need more information.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

-1
Tested at: 1260a0a
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
25202.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25.log
----- Begin Fatal Exception 05-Aug-2015 19:03:31 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=MixingModule label='mix'
Exception Message:
RootEmbeddedFileSequence no input files specified for secondary input source.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

4.22 step1

DAS Error

4.53 step1

DAS Error

140.53 step1

DAS Error

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10590/6994/summary.html

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 5, 2015

@cmsbuild please test
maybe less das errors this time

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 5, 2015

+1

for #10590 1260a0a

  • the code change looks reasonable
  • the code is not running in any standard workflows
  • jetnkins test compilation and unit tests are OK [the requested re-testing is a bit redundant]

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2015
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7ae8e01 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_6_X Aug 6, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants