Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

back port modified and newly added relval workflows from 75X and 76X #10615

Conversation

hengne
Copy link
Contributor

@hengne hengne commented Aug 6, 2015

Back port modified and newly added workflows from 75X and 76X, especially for GEN-SIM generation for relval workflows.
All fullSim noPU workflows for 13TeV are tested using latest IB.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 6, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @hengne (Hengne Li) for CMSSW_7_1_X.

back port modified and newly added relval workflows from 75X and 76X

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@vciulli, @covarell, @boudoul, @franzoni, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @bendavid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 7, 2015

@cmsbuild , please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 7, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 7, 2015

-1
Tested at: 59ca99e
you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10615/74550/summary.html

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 7, 2015

hi @hengne , you should modify the file relval_pileup which is still expecting the string QQH1352T_Tauola (while it is defined now as QQH1352T )

you might have to change other input file too (maybe relval_standard?)

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 7, 2015

Also line 511 should not be modified: In das , the dataset is /RelValQQH1352T_Tauola/CMSSW_7_1_0_pre7-PRE_STA71_V3-v1/GEN-SIM , which your change it will try to call RelValQQH1352T/CMSSW_7_1_0_pre7-PRE_STA71_V3-v1/GEN-SIM which doesn't exist and will fail

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 7, 2015

The change line 403 should be a typo, please fix

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 7, 2015

About the change lline 389 :
In DAS you can find dataset like
/RelValZpMM_2250_13TeV_Tauola/CMSSW_7_1__/GEN-SIM
or
/RelValZpMM_13/CMSSW_7_1__/GEN-SIM
but nothing like
/RelValZpMM_2250_13/CMSSW_7_1_*/GEN-SIM
which corresponds to your modified line 389 , please fix

This comment may also be true for the modifications for ZpEE_2250_13INPUT and ZpTT_2250_13INPUT , please check

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 7, 2015

Pull request #10615 was updated. @vciulli, @covarell, @boudoul, @franzoni, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @bendavid can you please check and sign again.

@hengne
Copy link
Contributor Author

hengne commented Aug 7, 2015

@boudoul thanks, also relval_premix.py should be modified at the same
time.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:09 AM, boudoul notifications@github.com wrote:

hi @hengne https://github.com/hengne , you should modify the file
relval_pileup which is still expecting the string QQH1352T_Tauola (while it
is defined now as QQH1352T )


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10615 (comment).

@hengne
Copy link
Contributor Author

hengne commented Aug 7, 2015

@boudoul thanks, fixed.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:21 AM, boudoul notifications@github.com wrote:

The change line 403 should be a typo, please fix


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10615 (comment).

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 11, 2015

Dear @hengne , before testing we should look at the content - I will do as soon as I can - Less than a working day can certainly not always be achievable, no need to ping twice a day - Please lower a bit your expectation

@hengne
Copy link
Contributor Author

hengne commented Aug 11, 2015

@boudoul Please trigger the test, there is nothing hurt by start the automatic test, the test also takes time. You can check the codes at anytime before you sign it. It has been there a day ago, if you trigger the test yesterday, we can already know if there is any technical bugs, for which i can already fix it before wasting your time to look at it.

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 11, 2015

Tests are resources, and they will anyway fail due to the DAS ongoing issues

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 12, 2015

@cmsbuild , please test

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 12, 2015

@covarell , @bendavid could you please take a look at this PR to eventually sign it , thank you much

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@covarell
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 13, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_1_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@hengne
Copy link
Contributor Author

hengne commented Aug 18, 2015

@davidlange6 Could this one be merged? It has been there ONLY orp-pending for 5 days! Thanks!

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Aug 18, 2015

Hi @hengne , for 71X a discussion at ORP is done (once per week) for the PR to be merged for the next 71 releases which are produced on request, so please no need ping the offline team in github, thanks

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2015
…0_relval_testedForMerge

back port modified and newly added relval workflows from 75X and 76X
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit bd32560 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_1_X Aug 19, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants