Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ES DQM fix to the number of good rechits #10815

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 31, 2015

Conversation

cmkuo
Copy link
Contributor

@cmkuo cmkuo commented Aug 17, 2015

this is to fix a bug when counting the number of good ES rechits

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @cmkuo for CMSSW_7_4_X.

ES DQM fix to the number of good rechits

It involves the following packages:

DQM/EcalPreshowerMonitorModule
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonProducers

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @danduggan, @deguio, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper, @argiro, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@lgray
Copy link
Contributor

lgray commented Aug 17, 2015

@cmkuo this PR doesn't depend on the MiniAOD changes. Please do something like:

git rebase -i --onto CMSSW_7_4_X_2015-08-16-2300 mydev_74x_ESDQM~1 mydev_74x_ESDQM
git push my-cmssw mydev_74x_ESDQM -f

To separate this pull request from the MiniAOD changes.
Also, please make forward ports (after you rebase) to 75X and 76X.

Thanks!

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 17, 2015

-1
please rebase as suggested, the reco signature will not be needed after that

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #10815 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

@lgray
Copy link
Contributor

lgray commented Aug 17, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: 200eb48
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
25202.0 step2

runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25.log
----- Begin Fatal Exception 17-Aug-2015 15:55:07 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Processing run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1
   [1] Running path 'digitisation_step'
   [2] Calling event method for module MixingModule/'mix'
Exception Message:
RootInputFileSequence::readOneRandom(): no input files specified for secondary input source.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

50202.0 N/A


1003.0 step1

DAS Error

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10815/7379/summary.html

@lgray
Copy link
Contributor

lgray commented Aug 18, 2015

@cmkuo please make forward ports of this to CMSSW_7_5_X and CMSSW_7_6_X

@danduggan
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@danduggan
Copy link
Contributor

@cmkuo could you also push this change to 75 and 76x?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: 200eb48
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
4.22 step1

DAS Error

1000.0 step1

DAS Error

1001.0 step1

DAS Error

1003.0 step1

DAS Error

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10815/7557/summary.html

@danduggan
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@danduggan
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2015
ES DQM fix to the number of good rechits
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2257a89 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_4_X Aug 31, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants