Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate RPCPointProducer to a global::EDProducer (76x) #10936

Merged

Conversation

fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

@fwyzard fwyzard commented Aug 25, 2015

migrate RPCPointProducer to a global::EDProducer

…eir own files

in the process:
  - rename ObjectMap to DTObjectMap
  - rename ObjectMapCSC to CSCObjectMap
  - merge multiple copies
  - change all configuration parameters into const members
  - initialise them in the member initializer list
  - remove unused methods and member variables
  - change into a global::EDProducer
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

migrate RPCPointProducer to a global::EDProducer (76x)

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/Configuration
RecoLocalMuon/RPCRecHit

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @bellan, @jalimena, @geoff-smith, @jhgoh this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Aug 25, 2015

rebase #10927 on top of CMSSW_7_6_X

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Aug 25, 2015

@cmsbuild please test


std::set<RPCDetId> const& CSCObjectMap::getRolls(CSCStationIndex index) const
{
// FIXME
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here I have kept the same behaviour as the previous implementation, which allows for NOT finding the given index in the map; a muon expert should check that this is the intended behaviour.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Aug 25, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #10936 was updated. @perrotta, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @Martin-Grunewald, @deguio, @fwyzard, @danduggan can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 78e33af
I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsRun /tmp/cmsbuild/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-08-24-2300/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_Fake.py realData=False globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Tue Aug 25 05:15:50 2015-date Tue Aug 25 05:05:45 2015 s - exit: 16640
cmsRun /tmp/cmsbuild/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-08-24-2300/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_Fake.py realData=True globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Tue Aug 25 05:09:32 2015-date Tue Aug 25 05:06:38 2015 s - exit: 16640

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10936/7626/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #10936 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @danduggan, @deguio, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@@ -119,14 +119,24 @@ def customiseFor10418(process):
setattr(process.hltBSoftMuonMu5L3,'algorithmMaskContains', cms.vstring())
return process

# migrate RPCPointProducer to a global::EDProducer (PR #10927)
def customiseFor10927(process):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this number "10972" (instead of 10936 or 10935) matter?

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 26, 2015

after looking at the code, I don't think additional changes have to be made in this PR

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 26, 2015

+1

for #10936 a0c1b57

  • changes in the code are OK for the purpose of making it thread-friendly
  • this code is running only in HLT at this point
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with baseline (full DQM or reco fwlite comparisons) show no differences as expected

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Aug 27, 2015

tracked at #10964

@danduggan
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2015
…part2

migrate RPCPointProducer to a global::EDProducer (76x)
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit a711127 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_6_X Aug 28, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants